Correction for range restriction in meta‐analysis revisited: Improvements and implications for organizational research
Image credit: Unsplash
Abstract
In this study, we present a more accurate method for correcting for range restriction (Case V) that expands upon Bryant and Gokhale’s (1972) method. We further present detailed steps to incorporate the Case V method into Schmidt and Hunter’s (2015) psychometric meta‐analysis methods (both individual correction and artifact distribution approaches). We then evaluate the accuracy of the Case V method vis‐à‐vis existing methods.
Type
Publication
Journal of Source Themes, 1(1)
Click the Cite button above to demo the feature to enable visitors to import publication metadata into their reference management software.
Click the Slides button above to demo Academic’s Markdown slides feature.
Supplementary notes can be added here, including code and math.
Colin Wooldridge
Assistant Professor of Management
My research interests include distributed robotics, mobile computing and programmable matter.